Creating Ethical Research Partnerships – Relational Accountability in Action

Authors

  • Robert Henry
  • Caroline Tait
  • STRAIGHT UP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15402/esj.v2i1.206

Abstract

Research that focuses on Indigenous street gangs is primarily derived from the experiences and expertise of individuals who work in the criminal justice system or community-based organizations and not street gang members themselves (Grekul & LaRocque, 2011). The primary reason for this is that it is difficult to build research relationships with individuals who, for the majority of their lives, have tried to keep their lives hidden from those who they consider as outsiders. However, it is these narratives of those who have been directly involved with street gangs that provide the greatest insight into what attracts individuals to join, the realities of street gang life, and what is needed to support individuals to exit street gangs. The current article examines how relational accountability framed within the 4Rs (Kirkness & Barnhardt, 1991) was used to engage in a photovoice research project that focused on how Indigenous male ex-gang members came to construct their notions of masculinity within local street gangs. To engage the men in the research, relationships were built with STR8 UP, a community-based gang intervention program located in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. By building relationships, the foundational components to Indigenous research, trust between researcher and participants was established where modifications within the research methods could occur to engage the men’s participation more fully. The current article also examines the importance of critical reflexivity within relational accountability, as it provides researchers with a tool to understand their social privileges and how this can impact the research process

Downloads

Published

2017-07-29

How to Cite

Henry, R., Tait, C., & UP, S. (2017). Creating Ethical Research Partnerships – Relational Accountability in Action. Engaged Scholar Journal: Community-Engaged Research, Teaching, and Learning, 2(1), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.15402/esj.v2i1.206