You’re Getting Two For One With Me: Difficult New Sites Of Community Engagement Leadership Within Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15402/esj.v9i1.70790Keywords:
Carnegie Community Engagement Classification pilots, community engagement professionals, Australian and Canadian higher educationAbstract
The emerging literature on community engagement professionals (Dostilio), who occupy a 'third space' (Whitchurch) between academics and professionals within higher education, has helped construct a potentially unifying identity among staff leading community engagement activity within contemporary post-secondary institutions. This presentation critically engages this literature, and profiles the professional identities of Australian and Canadian postsecondary staff leading the adaptation and adoption of the elective Carnegie Classification for Community Engagement in their institutions. Drawing from interview data of 15 staff responsible for the Carnegie Pilot within their institutions across both Australia and Canada, and employing a narrative inquiry method sensitive to feminist analyses of power and institutional misrecognition (Fraser), we probe the tensions and frustrations of those leading the work of community engagement. We find that although exercising considerable leadership of academic engagement functions, these staff, regardless of their own more hybridized identities as practitioner-scholars or 'prac-academics', are often misrecognized through institutional designations as professional staff. Two staff portraits in particular highlight two sources of misrecognition: gender intersecting with race, and from the relegation of community engagement to an external relations function that runs parallel to the core academic purposes of the institution. The Carnegie Pilots in Canada and Australia represent a valuable attempt to institutionalize community engagement as the critical third mission of higher education. Yet the experiences of these staff also attest to an ambivalence about community engagement within the academy, and the people leading this work, particularly in the most research-intensive and most established universities in each nation.
References
Abes, E.S., Jackson, G., & Jones, S.R. (2002). Factors that motivate and deter faculty use of service learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9(1), 5-17.
Acker, S. (2014) A foot in the revolving door? Women academics in lower-middle management. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(1), 73-85, https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.864615
American Council on Education (February 9, 2022). The Carnegie Foundation and the American Council on Education announce a partnership on the Carnegie Classifications for institutions of higher education. https://www.acenet.edu/News-Room/Pages/Carnegie-ACEAnnounce-Partnership-on-Classifications.aspx
Benneworth, P., Ćulum, B. Farnell, T., Kaiser, F., Seeber, M., Šćukanec, N., Vossensteyn, H., & Westerheijden, D. (2018). Mapping and Critical Synthesis of Current State-of-the-Art on Community Engagement in Higher Education. Institute for the Development of Education.
Blackmore, J., & Sachs, J. (2007). Performing and reforming leaders: Gender, educational restructuring, and organizational change. SUNY Press.
Carl, J., & Menter, M. (2021). The social impact of universities: assessing the effects of the three university missions on social engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 46(5), 965–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1896803
Carnegie Elective Classification for Community Engagement (2021). Canadian Pilot Cohort: Closing Report- Collective Feedback. Internal member report.
Clarke, M., Hyde, A. & Drennan, J. (2013). Professional identity in higher education. In B.M. Kehm, B.M. & U. Teichler (Eds.), The academic profession in Europe: New tasks and new challenges (pp. 1-21). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4614-5_2
Dostilio, L. D. (2017). The Community engagement professional in higher education: A competency model for an emerging field. Campus Compact.
Dostilio, L. D. & Perry, L. G. (2017). An explanation of community engagement professionals as professionals and leaders. In Dostilio, L. D. (Ed.), The Community engagement professional in higher education: A competency model for an emerging field. (pp. 1-25). Campus Compact.
Dostilio, L.D. & Welch, M. (2019). The community engagement professional’s guidebook: A companion to the community engagement professional in higher education. Campus Compact.
Engaged Scholarship Consortium (n.d.) Outreach and Engagement Practitioner Network. https://engagementscholarship.org/about/esc-partner-programs/outreach-and-engagementpractitioners-network.
Einarsdottir, U. D., Christiansen, T. H., & Kristjansdottir, E. S. (2018). “It’s a man who runs the show”: How women middle-managers experience their professional position, opportunities, and barriers. Sage Open, 8(1), 2158244017753989.
Fraser, N. (2000). Why overcoming prejudice is not enough: A rejoinder to Richard Rorty, Critical Horizons, 1(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851600510408
Griffiths, V. (2012). Women leaders in higher education: Organizational cultures and personal resilience. Generos, 1(1), pp. 70–94.
Grummell, B., Devine, D., & Lynch, K. (2009). The care-less manager: Gender, care and new managerialism in higher education. Gender and Education, 21(2), 191–208.
Guarino, C.M & Borden V.M.H. (2017). Faculty service loads and gender: Are women taking care of the academic family? Research in Higher Education, 58, 672–694. https://www-jstor-org.login.ezproxy.library.ualberta.ca/stable/26451569
Hanasono, L. K., Broido, E. M., Yacobucci, M. M., Root, K. V., Peña, S., & O’Neil, D. A. (2018). Secret service: Revealing gender biases in the visibility and value of faculty service. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 12(1), 85-98.
Hazelkorn, E. (2016). Contemporary debates part 1: Theorizing civic engagement. In Goddard, J., Hazelkorn, E., & Kempton, L. (Eds.), The civic university: The policy and leadership challenges. (pp. 34-64). https://ebookcentral.proquest.com.
Hirshfield, L.E. & Joseph, T.D. (2012). “We need a woman, we need a black woman”: Gender, race, and identity taxation in the academy. Gender and Education, 24(2), 213-227, https://doi.org.login.ezproxy.library.ualberta.ca/10.1080/09540253.2011.606208
Huppatz, K. & Goodwin, S. (2013). Masculinised jobs, feminised jobs and men’s ‘gender capital’ experiences: Understanding occupational segregation in Australia. Journal of Sociology, 49(2-3), 291–308.
https://doi-org.login.ezproxy.library.ualberta.ca/10.1177/1440783313481743
Ispa-landa, S., & Thomas, D. (2019). Race, gender, and emotion work among school principals. Innovative Research Universities Gender & Society, 33(3), 387–409.
Kloot, L. (2004). Women and leadership in universities. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(6), 470–485.
Kreber, C. (2009). The modern research university and its disciplines: The interplay between contextual and context-transcendent influences on teaching. In Kreber, C. (Ed.), The university and its disciplines: Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries (pp. 19–31). Routledge.
Lambert, T. (May 17, 2021). Alberta government unveils 10-year plan for PSE to mixed reviews. University Affairs. https://www.universityaffairs.ca/news/news-article/alberta-governmentunveils-10-year-plan-for-pse-to-mixed-reviews/
Ledwith, S., & Manfredi, S. (2000). Balancing gender in higher education. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 7(1), 7–33.
Lawless, B. (2018) Documenting a labor of love: Emotional labor as academic labor. Review of Communication, 18(2), 85-97. https://doi-org.10.1080/15358593.2018.1438644
Lechuga, V. M. (2012). Emotional management and motivation: A case study of underrepresented faculty. New Directions for Institutional Research, 155, 85-98.
McIlraith, L., Broderick, C., Naughton, M.M., Kelly, M. (2021). The Irish Carnegie Community Engagement Classification pilot: A critical analysis on culture and context from a community of practice approach. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 14(1), 1-15.
McNay, L. (1999). Gender, habitus and the field: Pierre Bourdieu and the limits of reflexivity. Theory, Culture & Society, 16(1), 95–117.
Miller, R.A., Howell, C.D. & Struve, L. (2019) “Constantly, excessively, and all the time”: The emotional labor of teaching diversity courses. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 31(3), 491-502.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Priola, V. (2007). Being female doing gender: Narratives of women in education management. Gender and Education, 19(1), 21–40.
Public Purpose Institute (n.d.). Defining community engagement. https://public-purpose.org/initiatives/carnegie-elective-classifications/community-engagementclassification-u-s/
Schneijderberg, C., & Merkator, N. (2013). The new higher education professionals. In B.M. Kehn & U. Teichler (Eds.), The academic profession in Europe: New tasks and new challenges, (pp. 53–92). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4614-5_5
Siegel, S. (2018). Participant Observation. In B.B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation, (pp. 1214-1215). Sage Publications.
Simon Fraser University (n.d.). Carnegie community engagement classification – Canadian pilot cohort. https://www.sfu.ca/carnegie.html
Smith, C., Holden, M., Yu, E., Hanlon, P. (2021). ‘So what do you do?’: Third space professionals navigating a Canadian university context. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 43 (5), 505-519. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2021.1884513
Stewart, S. (2019). Navigating the academy in the post-diaspora: #Afro-Caribbean feminism and the intellectual and emotional labour needed to transgress. Caribbean Review of Gender Studies, 13, 147–172.
Turner, C.S.V., Myers, S. L., & Creswell, J. W. (1999). Exploring underrepresentation: The Case of
Faculty of Color in the Midwest. The Journal of Higher Education, 70(1), 27–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/2649117
University of Technology Sydney (n.d.). Carnegie community engagement classification – Australia pilot. https://www.uts.edu.au/partners-and-community/initiatives/social-justice-uts/carnegiecommunity-engagement-classification.
Welch, M., & Saltmarsh, J. (2013). Current practice and infrastructures for campus centers of community engagement. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 17(4), 25–56.
Weerts, D.J. & Sandmann, L.R. (2008). Building a two-way street: Challenges and opportunities for community engagement at research universities. Review of Higher Education, 32(1), 73-106.
Weerts, D.J. & Sandmann, L.R. (2010). Community Engagement and Boundary-Spanning Roles at Research Universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(6), 632-657, https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2010.11779075
Whitchurch, C. (2008). Shifting identities and blurring boundaries: The emergence of third space professionals in UK higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), 377-396.
Whitchurch, C. (2012). Reconstructing identities in higher education: The rise of ‘third space’ professionals. Routledge.
Whitford, E. (January 12, 2022). Carnegie Classifications seek a new home – again. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2022/01/12/carnegie-classifications-will-notmove-albion-college
Woodiwiss, J., Smith, K., & Lockwood, K. (2017). Feminist narrative research: Opportunities and challenges. Palgrave Macmillan.
Zhou, Z. (May 12, 2021). Australian universities brace for ‘ugly’ 2022 after budget cuts. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/may/13/australianuniversities-brace-for-ugly-2022-after-budget-cuts
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in an institutional repository or on their website) after the publication of their work in the Engaged Scholar Journal.
- Please note that while every opportunity will be taken to ensure author participation in the editing process, due to time constraints final copyediting changes may be made before publication to ensure APA adherence throughout all submissions.
